Introduction to the Book of Acts

The following are my notes of Ed Gravely’s lecture on the book of Acts at SEBTS.

The Importance of Acts

Without the book of Acts our knowledge of the early church would be severely limited. We would not know:

– How the church expanded to the Gentiles
– Who the Apostle Paul was
– How to date the 4 gospels
– About the pouring out of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost
– How the early church behaved and lived (Entire denominations have been started because of the way people have understood whether or not Acts is prescriptive or descriptive.)

Arguments For An Early Dating of the Book of Acts

– An early date best fits the traditional authorship of Luke and the history of his travels with Paul.

– An early date best explains the neutral friendly attitude toward Rome.

– An early date best explains why Acts is generally unacquainted with Paul’s letters.

– No mention of Paul’s death is strong (though not conclusive) evidence for an early date.

Acts Is A Theological Document

– From beginning to end it is occupied with Jew-Gentile debates and issues.

– Acts undergoes a definite switch from the ministry of Peter (“Apostle to the Circumcision”) to the ministry of Paul (“Apostle to the Gentiles”)

– Acts follows an outline: the gospel goes from “Jerusalem” to “Judea and Samaria” to the “ends of the earth.” This is more than just a statement about geography, it is the outline of the book.

– Acts closes with a theological declaration about the gospel and its relationship to Jews and Gentiels.

– The dominance of “tongues” as theological affirmation of the gospel’s movement from Jew to Gentile.

Historical Reliability of Acts

Historical material can be categorized in three ways:
1. It can be proved to be true.
2. It can be proved to be false.
3. There is no way to prove it is true or false.

Acts is full of category one and category 3 and even though there are scholars label some of Acts into category 2 I do not believe there is any good reason to believe so.

In order to determine historical reliability of any ancient document you need these 3 things: Integrity, Historicity, Antiquity

Speeches In Acts

– The speeches in Acts make up about 25-30% of the book.

– The speeches in Acts are clearly not verbatim transcripts. For example, Peter’s sermon in the temple square lasted according to Luke from 3pm until evening (Acts 3:1; Acts 4:3) but only 17 verses of the speech are recorded. Luke seems to be giving accurate summaries of what was said. It was common in ancient historiography to prescribe accurate summations of speeches.

Genre of Acts

Acts exhibits many features of ancient Greco-Roman and Jewish historiography:

– Requests and dedications
– An apology for defective style
– Comments on the value and utility of the history
– Mention of predecessors
– Assurance of impartiality
– Use of appropriate methodology
– Reason for writing

Acts is a theological history, written in an educated style and methodology, a style not particularly beholden to any one precursor.

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Acts, Bible Summary, Lectures, SEBTS

2 responses to “Introduction to the Book of Acts

  1. Acts is a great book for all the reasons in your notes. I took a course on it with Dr. David Beck at SEBTS with the theme focus of church planting. I was thankful to form firmer views on a couple key doctrines (tongues, church, etc.). One of my favorite resources (and books in general) from that class was by Michael Green “Thirty Years That Changed the World”. I recommend you pick it up Phill if you have the chance.

    And Ed is a friend of mine, was in a church small group with him and his wife while we lived in NC. He is sharper wit than most I know.

    Once again, thanks for sharing your notes and ideas, always interesting to see what you’re learning.

    • Thanks for the book recommendation. Hopefully I can squeeze it into my reading sooner rather than later. I’m almost done my M.Div. so the days of being able to read books that are not required for class is almost here!

      Gravely’s lectures have been good. I have not had Dr. Black for any classes at SEBTS.

      Hope you, the family and the church are doing well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s